blog

Archive for the ‘Energy Efficient Mortgages’ Category

ENERGY EFFICENT MORTGAGES PART #5

Thursday, February 11th, 2010

Conventional EEMs

Fannie Mae also lends up to 5% for Energy Star new homes. Fannie Mae EEMs are available to single-family, owner-occupied units, and Fannie Mae provides EEMs to those whose income might otherwise disqualify them from receiving the loans by allowing approved lenders to adjust borrowers’ debt-to-income ratio by 2%. The value of the improvements is immediately added to the total appraised value of the home.

Freddie Mac offers EEMs for one- to four-unit dwellings and also helps raise the effective income of the borrower to qualifying levels by allowing lenders to increase the borrower’s income by a dollar amount equal to the estimated energy savings. Any energy efficiency improvements can qualify, and these mortgages can be combined with both fixed-rate and adjustable-rate mortgages. Borrowers should apply directly to the lender. See www.natresnet.org/resources/lender/default.htm for more details.

ENERGY EFFICENT MORTGAGES PART #4

Wednesday, February 10th, 2010

Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) Energy Efficient Mortgages

The VA insures EEMs to be used in conjunction with VA loans either for the purchase of existing homes or for refinancing loans secured by the dwelling. Homebuyers may borrow up to $3,000 if only documentation of improvement costs or contractor bids is submitted, or up to $6,000 if the projected energy savings are greater than the increase in mortgage payments. Loans may exceed this amount at the discretion of the VA. Applicants may not include the cost of their own labor in the total amount. No additional home appraisal is needed, but applicants must submit a HER, contractor bids and certain other documentation. The VA insures 50% of the loan if taken by itself, but it may insure less if the total value of the mortgage exceeds a certain amount.

ENERGY EFFICENT MORTGAGES PART #3

Tuesday, February 9th, 2010

FHA Energy Efficient Mortgages

In the last few years, FHA loans have become the loan of choice for people putting down around 5%. The FHA allows lenders to add up to 100% of energy efficiency improvements to an existing mortgage loan with certain restrictions. FHA mortgage limits vary by county, state and the number of units in a dwelling. See www.fha.com/lending_limits.cfm for more details. These mortgages were previously limited to $8,000. In June 2009, HUD issued Mortgagee Letter 2009-18 which announced the removal of the dollar cap. The maximum amount of the portion of an energy efficient mortgage allowed for energy improvements is now the lesser of 5% of:

• The value of the property,
• 115% of the median area price of a single-family dwelling, or
• 150% of the Freddie Mac conforming loan limit

Loan amounts may not exceed the projected savings of the energy efficiency improvements. FHA loan limits do not apply to the EEM. Presently, up to $200 of the cost of the HER may be included in the mortgage, and borrowers may include closing costs and the up-front mortgage insurance premium in the total cost of the loan. The loan is available to anyone who meets the income requirements for FHA’s Section 203 (b), provided the applicant can meet the monthly mortgage payments. New and existing owner-occupied homes of up to two units qualify for this loan.

ENERGY EFFICENT MORTGAGES PART #2

Monday, February 8th, 2010

The Good & the Bad News of Energy Efficient Mortgages (EEM’s). EEM’s do exist, but to be honest I have not been able to find a single person who has done one. I am sure they out there, but they are far and few in-between.

Homeowners can take advantage of EEM to finance a variety of energy efficiency measures, including renewable energy technologies, in a new or existing home. The U.S. federal government supports these loans by insuring them through Federal Housing Authority (FHA) or Veterans Affairs (VA) programs. This allows borrowers who might otherwise be denied loans to pursue energy efficiency improvements, and it secures lenders against loan default.

In general, the idea is that the EEM allows the lender to:
1. Finance above the appraised value
In theory, this sounds like a reasonable idea. Then the appraiser does not necessarily have to take into account the energy efficient items and the lender can exceed the appraised value. In practicality, in the current real estate market, mortgage underwriters are already panicked about valuation after the last few years. Trying to explain this process to a mortgage underwriter who is not familiar with an EEM is like to talking Greek to a Texan. You just get that blank stare or silence on the other end of the telephone. As mentioned earlier, as “green” building gains some momentum and the industry gets trained, I am sure this will not be as big of an issue. For now, at Amaris, we make our best effort to build the cost into the normal appraisal and by-pass this entire headache.

2. Stretch the debt to income ratio for qualification
Again, similar to financing in excess of the appraised value, stretching the debt to income has the same challenges with the mortgage underwriter. Some programs allow this stretching the debt to income ratio, while other programs do not. The idea is that an energy efficient home will have lower utility bills forever. If you qualify for a mortgage of 2,500.00 per month and the utilities are going to be 250 per month, it only makes sense that a 2,600 per month mortgage payment with 150 per month utilities should not be a problem. With our customers, we do not stretch them in the qualification process and to be honest the trend by customers is fiscal prudence and they would not necessarily want to stretch financially anyway.

ENERGY EFFICENT MORTGAGES PART #1

Friday, February 5th, 2010

One of the major issues we have run into with homes built “green” (e.g. LEED for Homes or Minnesota Green Standards) is that the appraisal industry is not trained to recognize and value the green aspects of “green” building. In recent years with price deflation caused by nearby foreclosed homes, it is nearly impossible at times get a fair hearing on the differentiation of a “green” home.
 
After the mortgage bubble and scams, appraisers, underwriters and the mortgage industry in general has little sympathy for a “green” builder trying to obtain a market appraisal taking into consideration the “green” aspects of the home. Building “green” absolutely does cost more, are better quality homes and have shown to demand higher resale pricing around the country, but none of that seems to matter when the appraisal comes in below the construction cost.
 
The required third-party certification and testing alone costs $3,000-5,000. There is a major disconnect between the folks making up the “green” certification programs and the appraisal and mortgage industry. If the buyer is putting down a significant down payment, the problem does not necessarily go away either. The lender may be satisfied because the down payment solves the problem for them; however the builder has to explain why he is charging more for the home than the appraisal amount. No one wants to over pay and a low appraisal is a red flag that becomes an issue that the builder has to sell through. In situations where the buyer is putting down a small down payment, then the transaction is lost.
 
Yes, there is a product out there called Energy Efficient Mortgage, but I have yet to find a mortgage lender, underwriter or appraiser who understands them and has experience with them. From a macro perspective, the mortgage industry is not trained on energy efficient mortgages and much work needs to be done to address the gap between “green” certification programs and appraisal standards. To the best of my knowledge, there is no official guidance for appraisers with regards to LEED for Homes or any other Green certified home program and there are no special forms or consideration required by FHA for appraisers.
 
In the meantime, we do our best to overcome this by providing the appraiser and lender with detailed documentation. We provide detailed “green” specifications outlining the complete details of the green building process. Our average, our “green” specification for a residential home is approximately 40 pages. These specifications alerts the appraiser and lender that something different is going on. Second, we provide a sworn construction statement outlining the energy efficient upgrades to make it easy for the appraiser and lender to identify those costs. Finally, while I don’t expect that vast majority of appraisers to grasp the detail of construction drawings, our drawings carry a fair amount of detail that coincide with the “green” specifications.
 
Does providing the detail matter? I know appraisers will all tell you they do their work objectively. To some degree that is true and some degree not true. I believe an appraiser may look at the data objectively but as they do, they develop a “number” in their head and work towards that number. Our supporting data is our effort to help an appraiser decide on the “number”.